Local News

EY warns of challenges taxing foreign digital services

13 October 2026
This content originally appeared on Trinidad Guardian.
Promote your business with NAN

The Gov­ern­ment’s plan to im­pose VAT on dig­i­tal ser­vices sup­plied by for­eign com­pa­nies will re­quire a new reg­is­tra­tion and col­lec­tion sys­tem, as the mea­sure seeks to bring ser­vices pro­vid­ed by non-res­i­dent busi­ness­es in­to the tax net.

In its re­view of the 2027 bud­get, pro­fes­sion­al ser­vices firm EY said that un­der the ex­ist­ing VAT Act, dig­i­tal ser­vices sup­plied by non-res­i­dents fall out­side the tax net be­cause “the sup­ply is deemed to take place out­side of T&T”.

The Gov­ern­ment pro­pos­es to ap­ply VAT to dig­i­tal ser­vices sup­plied by non-res­i­dent providers to peo­ple in Trinidad and To­ba­go. EY said a sim­pli­fied reg­is­tra­tion sys­tem would al­low for­eign sup­pli­ers to reg­is­ter, col­lect and re­mit VAT elec­tron­i­cal­ly.

“The spe­cif­ic cat­e­gories of ser­vices to be cov­ered have not yet been de­fined,” the firm said.

Based on sim­i­lar leg­is­la­tion in­tro­duced or pro­posed else­where in the Caribbean, EY ex­pects the mea­sure to cov­er “dig­i­tal con­tent, sub­scrip­tions, cloud ser­vices, web host­ing, on­line ad­ver­tis­ing and as­so­ci­at­ed charges”.

EY said an al­ter­na­tive used in some ju­ris­dic­tions was a re­verse-charge mech­a­nism, un­der which lo­cal re­cip­i­ents as­sess and pay VAT on im­port­ed ser­vices them­selves.

“While the pro­posed regime places the com­pli­ance oblig­a­tion on non-res­i­dent sup­pli­ers, con­sid­er­a­tion could al­so be giv­en to a re­verse-charge mech­a­nism, par­tic­u­lar­ly for busi­ness-to-busi­ness trans­ac­tions,” the firm said.

The dig­i­tal VAT pro­pos­al forms part of a wider rev­enue push that in­cludes changes to the treat­ment of cor­po­rate tax loss­es, ex­pens­es in­curred in earn­ing ex­empt in­come and pay­ments to non-res­i­dents for cer­tain ser­vices.

The bud­get pro­pos­es lim­it­ing the use of car­ried-for­ward tax loss­es to 75 per cent of charge­able prof­its in any in­come year, a mea­sure ex­pect­ed to gen­er­ate $430 mil­lion.

The change would pre­vent com­pa­nies from ful­ly off­set­ting an­nu­al prof­its against loss­es ac­cu­mu­lat­ed in pre­vi­ous years, po­ten­tial­ly in­creas­ing tax li­a­bil­i­ties for re­cov­er­ing busi­ness­es, start-ups and cap­i­tal-in­ten­sive in­dus­tries.

A sep­a­rate pro­pos­al to make ex­pens­es in­curred in earn­ing ex­empt in­come non-de­ductible is ex­pect­ed to gen­er­ate $75 mil­lion.

EY said the mea­sure ap­peared rea­son­able where ex­pens­es re­lat­ed di­rect­ly and ex­clu­sive­ly to ex­empt in­come, but warned that its ap­pli­ca­tion to CARI­COM-source in­come could raise ques­tions about the treat­ment of in­come un­der ex­ist­ing tax treaties.

The bud­get al­so pro­pos­es ex­tend­ing with­hold­ing tax to re­mote man­age­ment, tech­ni­cal and oth­er pre­scribed ser­vices pro­vid­ed by non-res­i­dents.

While the Fi­nance Min­is­ter de­scribed the pre­vi­ous ex­clu­sion as a leg­isla­tive loop­hole, EY said the ex­clu­sion was a defin­ing fea­ture of the coun­try’s tax regime.

EY al­so warned that chang­ing se­lect­ed items from ze­ro-rat­ed to VAT-ex­empt sta­tus could in­crease costs for busi­ness­es. Al­though con­sumers might not be charged VAT di­rect­ly on those sup­plies, busi­ness­es would gen­er­al­ly lose the abil­i­ty to re­cov­er VAT in­curred on re­lat­ed ex­pens­es.

“Con­sumers may see no VAT charged, but sup­pli­ers gen­er­al­ly lose the abil­i­ty to re­cov­er VAT. That be­comes a busi­ness cost and may even­tu­al­ly find its way in­to prices,” EY said.

The firm al­so iden­ti­fied out­stand­ing ques­tions about the VAT re­fund back­log, the op­er­a­tional arrange­ments for the pro­posed US-dol­lar sav­ings bonds, the fi­nal­i­sa­tion of trans­fer pric­ing leg­is­la­tion and com­pli­ance re­quire­ments for manda­to­ry elec­tron­ic fil­ing through GEN­TAX.

The bud­get projects a fis­cal deficit of $3.639 bil­lion, or 2.1 per cent of gross do­mes­tic prod­uct, for fis­cal 2027, based on an as­sumed oil price of US$77 a bar­rel and a nat­ur­al gas price of US$5 per mil­lion British ther­mal units.

How­ev­er, re­al GDP con­tract­ed by 1.8 per cent year on year in the first quar­ter of 2026, while en­er­gy out­put fell by 2.8 per cent.

EY ac­knowl­edged in­creas­es in pen­sion­ers’ per­son­al al­lowances and so­cial grants but said the struc­tur­al trans­for­ma­tion promised in the Gov­ern­ment’s 2025 man­i­festo re­mained a work in progress.