Local News

PwC flags unanswered questions in budget’s digital tax plans

13 October 2026
This content originally appeared on Trinidad Guardian.
Promote your business with NAN

PwC has warned that sev­er­al de­tails of the Gov­ern­ment’s pro­posed tax changes re­main un­re­solved, in­clud­ing how Trinidad and To­ba­go in­tends to col­lect VAT on dig­i­tal ser­vices sup­plied by for­eign com­pa­nies with­out cre­at­ing ad­di­tion­al costs or com­pli­ance bur­dens for busi­ness­es.

In its analy­sis of the 2026-2027 Na­tion­al Bud­get, PwC said the pro­posed stan­dard-rat­ing of dig­i­tal and re­mote ser­vices sup­plied by non-res­i­dent providers, ef­fec­tive March 1, 2027, would re­quire clear rules on which trans­ac­tions are cov­ered, how cus­tomers’ lo­ca­tions are de­ter­mined and how the tax would ap­ply to busi­ness-to-busi­ness trans­ac­tions.

The mea­sure is pro­ject­ed to gen­er­ate $18 mil­lion in rev­enue.

The pro­posed changes al­so in­clude a sim­pli­fied elec­tron­ic reg­is­tra­tion sys­tem to cap­ture for­eign providers of stream­ing ser­vices, soft­ware and dig­i­tal plat­forms, with the aim of cre­at­ing a more lev­el play­ing field be­tween over­seas sup­pli­ers and do­mes­tic busi­ness­es.

How­ev­er, PwC said the ef­fec­tive­ness of the mea­sure would de­pend on how the leg­is­la­tion ad­dress­es reg­is­tra­tion thresh­olds, the li­a­bil­i­ty of on­line mar­ket­places and the in­ter­ac­tion be­tween VAT and with­hold­ing tax.

“Ef­fi­cient col­lec­tion should not re­sult in two tax­es on one pay­ment or make Trinidad and To­ba­go un­nec­es­sar­i­ly dif­fi­cult for glob­al plat­forms to serve,” the firm said.

PwC al­so ques­tioned how far the sim­pli­fied reg­is­tra­tion frame­work would ex­tend be­yond dig­i­tal ser­vices, in­clud­ing whether it would cap­ture non-res­i­dent providers who phys­i­cal­ly per­form ser­vices in Trinidad and To­ba­go or sup­ply goods while meet­ing the rel­e­vant reg­is­tra­tion thresh­old.

The analy­sis forms part of a broad­er as­sess­ment of the bud­get’s pro­posed tax re­forms, which PwC said would re­quire fur­ther clar­i­ty to en­sure busi­ness­es can com­ply with­out fac­ing un­nec­es­sary un­cer­tain­ty.

Among the oth­er ar­eas flagged was the pro­posed in­crease in with­hold­ing tax on dis­tri­b­u­tions to non-res­i­dents to 10 per cent gen­er­al­ly and five per cent for par­ent com­pa­nies.

The bud­get al­so pro­pos­es changes to Sec­tion 50(1)(b) of the In­come Tax Act to tar­get re­mote­ly sup­plied man­age­ment, tech­ni­cal and pre­scribed ser­vices.

PwC said clear rules on the source of in­come and ef­fec­tive re­lief from dou­ble tax­a­tion would be nec­es­sary to avoid dis­cour­ag­ing le­git­i­mate ac­cess to for­eign ex­per­tise and cap­i­tal.

The firm al­so point­ed to the ab­sence of a com­pre­hen­sive trans­fer pric­ing frame­work, de­spite the is­sue fea­tur­ing in pre­vi­ous bud­gets.

It said the suc­cess of re­form should be mea­sured by whether the regime works in prac­tice, rather than by the tech­ni­cal am­bi­tion of the leg­is­la­tion alone.

An­oth­er pro­posed change would amend Sec­tion 10 of the In­come Tax Act to dis­al­low ex­pens­es in­curred in earn­ing ex­empt in­come.

PwC said busi­ness­es with mixed ac­tiv­i­ties could face un­cer­tain­ty over how to al­lo­cate shared ex­pens­es, mak­ing clear guid­ance on ac­cept­able al­lo­ca­tion meth­ods im­por­tant.

The analy­sis al­so raised con­cerns about the ad­min­is­tra­tion of VAT, in­clud­ing the pro­posed $100 VAT clear­ance fee and penal­ties for out­stand­ing re­turns.

PwC said stronger en­force­ment of tax oblig­a­tions should be matched by time­ly ad­min­is­tra­tive ac­tion, par­tic­u­lar­ly when busi­ness­es are due re­funds.

“If tax­pay­ers are ex­pect­ed to file and pay prompt­ly, they should al­so re­ceive le­git­i­mate re­funds prompt­ly,” the firm said.

It warned that de­layed re­funds ef­fec­tive­ly turn busi­ness­es in­to in­vol­un­tary lenders to the State, ty­ing up work­ing cap­i­tal that could oth­er­wise sup­port in­vest­ment.