Homeland Security Minister Roger Alexander has asked the State of Emergency (SoE) Review Tribunal to withdraw its preliminary recommendations in relation to the continued detention of businessman Dominic Hadeed, his wife Genevieve and their relative Star Sabga over its failure to solicit his views in relation to the legal proceedings before it.
Lawyers representing Alexander, led by Senior Counsel Anand Ramlogan of Freedom Law Chambers, made the request on Monday after the tribunal reportedly found that the trio’s continued detention was not necessary or expedient in the public interest the previous day.
In a letter sent to the tribunal’s chairman David Alexander (no relation), attorney Jared Jagroo noted that his client was not notified and given an opportunity to make submissions when the tribunal heard the trio’s challenges on an ex-parte basis, last week.
“It is clear from the preceding that the conduct of the proceedings before the Review Tribunal in the case of each of the detainees was conducted in a manner that was procedurally unfair to the Minister,” Jagroo said.
“This deprived the Minister of the opportunity to answer the case advanced by the detainees and has reasons why the case of the detainees should be rejected,” he added.
Jagroo claimed that Alexander’s right to be heard was breached and the action breached the rules of procedural fairness.
“The tribunal then proceeded to deliver a ‘report’ the totality of which amounted to an unsupported recommendation with no reasons in support,” he said.
Jagroo called on the tribunal to recall its recommendations and reconvene the hearing to review the trio’s detentions after considering Alexander’s views.
“Having regard to the importance of far-reaching consequences of any recommendation that may be made by the tribunal and to protect and preserve the confidence in the tribunal, we expect that this matter and the request herein will be treated with the utmost urgency,” Jagroo said.
Alexander is also being represented by Lester Chariah and Lemuel Murphy.
Guardian Media was unable to confirm if the tribunal eventually acceded to Alexander’s request within the deadline set by his lawyers.
Under the Emergency Powers Regulations (EPR) for the SoE, the three-member panel—David Alexander, Ronnie Persad and Arden Williams—is empowered to review Preventive Detention Orders (PDOs) issued by Alexander to protect national security and preserve public order.
However, Alexander is not required to accept the recommendations of the tribunal and can reject such while giving reasons for doing so.
The tribunal had recommended that Dominic Hadeed be released after finding that his continued detention was not necessary or expedient in the public interest.
Guardian Media has since confirmed that similar applications were filed by Genevieve Hadeed and Star Sabga. While the tribunal has not disclosed its recommendations in their cases, legal sources said both women were also recommended for release. Calls to the minister and the tribunal for comment went unanswered.
The request by Alexander for the SoE Tribunal to revisit its recommendation that Dominic Hadeed be released is not new.
Attorney Keron Ramkhalwan, who represents inmate Lloyd Sealey, is currently challenging a similar decision by Alexander in April, when the minister rejected the tribunal’s recommendation that Sealey be freed.
In Sealey’s case, the tribunal also found there was insufficient cause for his continued detention. However, in a May 20 response, Alexander rejected the recommendation and gave four reasons for keeping Sealey in custody.
As in the Hadeed matter, Alexander said, “I was not afforded an opportunity to be present or make representations at the review hearing.”
He added, “The absence of reasons and failure to allow myself an opportunity to be heard substantially weakens the persuasive value of the tribunal’s report and does not oblige me to depart from the detailed intelligence and investigative assessments of the Trinidad and Tobago Police Service.”
Alexander said, “I have determined that the said recommendation cannot be accepted at this time and the detention shall accordingly continue under the authority of the existing Detention Order.”
The current SoE expires on September 17.
Following Alexander’s decision, Ramkhalwan was granted leave to seek Judicial Review of the decision to issue a Preventive Detention Order (PDO) authorising Sealey’s detention on March 24, and the minister’s rejection of the tribunal’s May 20 recommendation.
Justice Christopher Sieuchand deemed the matter urgent and ordered Alexander to respond by 4 pm on July 29. A virtual case management conference is set for July 31 at 3 pm.
People’s National Movement (PNM) chairman and Opposition Chief Whip Marvin Gonzales criticised Alexander’s decision in a Facebook post yesterday.
“The State of Emergency Tribunal has recommended that Dominic Hadeed be released from custody, finding that his continued detention was not necessary or expedient in the public interest. Rather than act on that recommendation, the Minister of Homeland Security has instead asked the tribunal to reopen the process delaying, yet again, what should have been a straightforward matter of justice.”
Gonzales repeated his call for “an immediate investigation into the State’s use of Preventative Detention Orders.”
He called on the Law Association, social groups, religious organisations and citizens to speak out.