Local News

Foreign ticket holders from World Cup qualifying countries won’t have to pay bonds to enter US

13 May 2026
This content originally appeared on Trinidad Guardian.
Promote your business with NAN

The Trump ad­min­is­tra­tion is sus­pend­ing a re­quire­ment that for­eign vis­i­tors from coun­tries that have qual­i­fied for the World Cup and have bought tick­ets for the soc­cer tour­na­ment pay as much as $15,000 in bonds to en­ter the Unit­ed States, the State De­part­ment said Wednes­day.

The de­part­ment im­posed the bond re­quire­ment last year for coun­tries that it said had high rates of peo­ple over­stay­ing their visas and oth­er se­cu­ri­ty is­sues as part of the Re­pub­li­can ad­min­is­tra­tion’s broad­er crack­down on im­mi­gra­tion.

Trav­el­ers to the Unit­ed States from 50 coun­tries are re­quired to pay the new bond, and five of those coun­tries have qual­i­fied for the World Cup — Al­ge­ria, Cape Verde, Ivory Coast, Sene­gal and Tunisia.

Cit­i­zens from those five coun­tries who have pur­chased tick­ets from FI­FA are now ex­empt from the visa bond re­quire­ment. World Cup team play­ers, coach­es and some staff al­ready had been ex­empt from the bond re­quire­ment as part of the ad­min­is­tra­tion’s or­ders to pri­or­i­tize the pro­cess­ing of visas for the tour­na­ment.

“The Unit­ed States is ex­cit­ed to or­ga­nize the biggest and best FI­FA World Cup in his­to­ry,” As­sis­tant Sec­re­tary of State for Con­sular Af­fairs Mo­ra Nam­dar said. “We are waiv­ing visa bonds for qual­i­fied fans who bought World Cup tick­ets” and opt­ed in to the FI­FA Pass sys­tem that al­lows ex­pe­dit­ed visa ap­point­ments as of April 15.

The waiv­er is a rare loos­en­ing of im­mi­gra­tion re­quire­ments un­der the ad­min­is­tra­tion and will ease trav­el bur­dens for at least some vis­i­tors to the U.S. for the World Cup, which be­gins June 11 and is co-host­ed by the Unit­ed States, Cana­da and Mex­i­co.

The ad­min­is­tra­tion has tak­en dra­mat­ic steps to re­strict im­mi­gra­tion in ways that crit­ics say are in­con­gru­ous with the type of uni­fy­ing mes­sage that a glob­al sport­ing event such as the World Cup is sup­posed to project.

For in­stance, the ad­min­is­tra­tion has barred trav­ellers from Iran and Haiti, though World Cup play­ers, coach­es and oth­er sup­port per­son­nel are ex­empt. Trav­el­ers from Ivory Coast and Sene­gal, face par­tial re­stric­tions un­der an ex­pand­ed ver­sion of that trav­el ban, even with­out the visa bond ex­emp­tion.

For­eign trav­ellers al­so had faced po­ten­tial new re­quire­ments to sub­mit their so­cial me­dia his­to­ries, al­though that pol­i­cy from U.S. Cus­toms and Bor­der Pro­tec­tion had not gone in­to ef­fect. Al­so, the ad­min­is­tra­tion had de­ployed U.S. Im­mi­gra­tion and Cus­toms En­force­ment agents at air­ports re­cent­ly when Trans­porta­tion Se­cu­ri­ty Ad­min­is­tra­tion per­son­nel were not be­ing paid dur­ing a par­tial fed­er­al shut­down.

Those mea­sures prompt­ed Amnesty In­ter­na­tion­al and dozens of U.S. civ­il and hu­man rights groups to is­sue a “World Cup trav­el ad­vi­so­ry” that warns trav­ellers about the cli­mate in the U.S.

In a re­port this month, the main ad­vo­ca­cy group for U.S. ho­tels blamed visa bar­ri­ers and oth­er geopo­lit­i­cal is­sues for “sig­nif­i­cant­ly sup­press­ing in­ter­na­tion­al de­mand,” lead­ing to ho­tel book­ings for the soc­cer tour­na­ment that are far be­low what had ini­tial­ly been an­tic­i­pat­ed.

The Amer­i­can Ho­tel & Lodg­ing As­so­ci­a­tion said trav­ellers are con­cerned about po­ten­tial­ly lengthy visa wait times and in­creased fees, along with un­cer­tain­ty about how they’re be­ing processed to en­ter the U.S.

The bond re­quire­ments are part of the ad­min­is­tra­tion’s larg­er ef­fort to clamp down on mi­grants who trav­el to the U.S. on tem­po­rary visas but then over­stay them. Visa ap­pli­cants from the af­fect­ed coun­tries are re­quired to pay $5,000, $10,000 or $15,000 in bonds, which will be re­fund­ed if the trav­eller com­plies with the terms of the visa or if the visa ap­pli­ca­tion is de­nied.

As of ear­ly April, the num­ber of World Cup fans af­fect­ed by the bond re­quire­ment was be­lieved to be rel­a­tive­ly small, per­haps on­ly about 250 peo­ple, ac­cord­ing to U.S. of­fi­cials who were not au­tho­rized to com­ment pub­licly and spoke on con­di­tion of anonymi­ty. But they said that num­ber was chang­ing rapid­ly as more peo­ple buy tick­ets and some with tick­ets opt against trav­el­ing.

FI­FA had re­quest­ed the waiv­er, which had to be ap­proved by the State De­part­ment and De­part­ment of Home­land Se­cu­ri­ty, and was the top­ic of dis­cus­sion at mul­ti­ple meet­ings at the White House and else­where in Wash­ing­ton for sev­er­al months, the of­fi­cials said. —WASH­ING­TON (AP)

_________

Sto­ry by SE­UNG MIN KIM and MATTHEW LEE | As­so­ci­at­ed Press