Local News

BACKPAY BACCHANAL

04 December 2025
This content originally appeared on Trinidad Guardian.
Promote your business with NAN

Se­nior Mul­ti­me­dia Re­porter

rad­hi­[email protected]

A fresh dis­pute has erupt­ed be­tween the Pub­lic Ser­vices As­so­ci­a­tion (PSA) and Chief Per­son­nel Of­fi­cer (CPO) Dr Daryl Din­di­al—de­spite both sides sign­ing off on a ten per cent wage in­crease for pub­lic ser­vants on Tues­day.

At the cen­tre of the dis­pute is how the es­ti­mat­ed $3.8 bil­lion in back­pay will be de­liv­ered to over 25,000 PSA mem­bers.

Guardian Me­dia un­der­stands that while an ad­vance pay­ment will be is­sued in cash on or be­fore De­cem­ber 23, the re­main­der of the back­pay may be of­fered through non-cash op­tions.

PSA pres­i­dent Fe­l­isha Thomas has pub­licly ac­cused the CPO of block­ing the pay­ments on so­cial me­dia, post­ing “Chief Per­son­nel Ob­struc­tion­ist.” How­ev­er, Din­di­al has pushed back, say­ing the PSA’s in­ter­pre­ta­tion of the agree­ment does not re­flect the Gov­ern­ment’s po­si­tion and that non-cash op­tions were al­ways part of the dis­cus­sions - an arrange­ment which Gov­ern­ment al­so seems in align­ment with

Din­di­al said: “The CPO, dur­ing these ne­go­ti­a­tions, has re­flect­ed the min­is­ter’s di­rec­tives and has main­tained that non-cash items must form part of the dis­cus­sion.”

In terms of cash set­tle­ments, Din­di­al said “all dis­cus­sions thus far have been specif­i­cal­ly to the ad­vance pay­ment.”

“I am clear, there­fore, that both Min­is­ter and I have been con­sis­tent. I can­not be held re­spon­si­ble for any­one’s in­ter­pre­ta­tion oth­er­wise, and I pre­fer not to com­ment on fu­ture ne­go­ti­a­tions at this point. I wish to use this op­por­tu­ni­ty to ad­vise pub­lic com­men­ta­tors to be cir­cum­spect in their pub­lic ut­ter­ances. We have al­ready seen in­stances where mem­bers of the pub­lic re­act­ed to pub­lic ut­ter­ances with threats of vi­o­lence against pub­lic of­fi­cials, in­clud­ing my­self.”

The CPO not­ed that the ne­go­ti­a­tions had re­flect­ed the min­is­ter’s di­rec­tives and has main­tained that non-cash items must form part of the dis­cus­sion.

At­tempts to con­tact PSA pres­i­dent Fe­l­isha Thomas for fur­ther com­ment proved fu­tile.

Fi­nance Min­is­ter Dave Tan­coo, when con­tact­ed yes­ter­day, al­so con­firmed that while the ad­vance pay­ment will be in cash, the union may have to con­sid­er non-cash arrange­ments for the re­main­der of the out­stand­ing ar­rears.

He said the process of ac­cess­ing the funds is un­der­way and that he will pro­vide clar­i­fi­ca­tion “once com­plet­ed.”

Min­is­ter Tan­coo is ex­pect­ed to re­veal next week how the Gov­ern­ment in­tends to fi­nance the es­ti­mat­ed $4.2 bil­lion set­tle­ment, which in­cludes $3.8 bil­lion back­pay and $420 mil­lion as a re­cur­rent an­nu­al cost.

Past wage set­tle­ments — such as the 2011–2013 14 per cent in­crease — re­sult­ed in sig­nif­i­cant back­pay oblig­a­tions, with no­tice­able im­pacts on fis­cal space and bud­get pri­or­i­ties.

The ten per cent wage in­crease ful­filled a cam­paign promise first made by the Gov­ern­ment dur­ing the last Gen­er­al Elec­tion cam­paign, fol­low­ing more than a decade with­out any move­ment on salaries for the es­ti­mat­ed 25,000 pub­lic ser­vants rep­re­sent­ed by the PSA.

Work­ers have been wait­ing for an ad­just­ment since the last ne­go­ti­at­ed pe­ri­od end­ed in 2013, with no new in­creas­es agreed up­on for the 2014-2019 cy­cle. This left pub­lic ser­vants with­out a salary re­vi­sion for more than ten years, even as ne­go­ti­a­tions re­peat­ed­ly stalled and the cost of liv­ing rose.

A Gov­ern­ment source yes­ter­day told Guardian Me­dia that the cash ad­vance will be about $500 mil­lion, which rep­re­sents just over 13 per cent of the pro­ject­ed $3.8 bil­lion pay­out.