Local News

HADEEDS’ HOPES FOR FREEDOM DASHED

17 July 2026
This content originally appeared on Trinidad Guardian.
Promote your business with NAN

Busi­ness­man Do­minic Hadeed and his wife Genevieve’s hopes for free­dom were dashed yes­ter­day, af­ter the State se­cured a late-night Ap­peal Court rul­ing which or­dered a stay of an ear­li­er judg­ment which had or­dered that they be re­leased from jail and be placed un­der house ar­rest.

Fol­low­ing an emer­gency hear­ing last night, Chief Jus­tice Ron­nie Boodoos­ingh and Ap­pel­late Judges Mark Mo­hammed and Ricky Rahim grant­ed an in­ter­im stay of the judg­ment de­liv­ered hours ear­li­er by three of their col­leagues.

The pan­el al­so grant­ed fi­nal leave for an ap­peal to the Privy Coun­cil by the State, as the move for the coun­try’s high­est ap­pel­late court to weigh in on the case was not op­posed by the cou­ple’s le­gal team.

The out­come of last-minute de­vel­op­ment meant that the cou­ple were not re­leased from the Gold­en Grove Prison in Arou­ca to re­turn to their West­moor­ings home as ini­tial­ly an­tic­i­pat­ed, and de­spite ear­li­er ef­forts to fa­cil­i­tate the court’s ini­tial or­der.

The in­ter­im stay will re­main in place un­til CJ Boodoos­ingh and his col­leagues hear fur­ther sub­mis­sions on the is­sue at 3 pm to­day.

Lawyers for the T&T Po­lice Ser­vice (TTPS) and the At­tor­ney Gen­er­al’s Of­fice, led by at­tor­ney Ger­ald Ramdeen, ini­tial­ly sought the stay af­ter Ap­pel­late Judges Pe­ter Ra­jku­mar, Mi­ra Dean-Ar­mor­er and Joan Charles up­held the Hadeeds’ ap­peal over the re­fusal of High Court Judge Frank Seep­er­sad to or­der their in­ter­im re­lease.

Those judges found it un­nec­es­sary, as they claimed such would not af­fect the fi­nal ap­peal or the on­go­ing probe in­to an al­leged plot to kill Gov­ern­ment of­fi­cials.

CJ Boodoos­ingh and his two oth­er col­leagues took a dif­fer­ent pre­lim­i­nary view when the ap­pli­ca­tion was pre­sent­ed be­fore them hours lat­er.

The Hadeeds were ar­rest­ed on June 24 and spent 22 days in cus­tody be­fore the Ap­peal pan­el of Ra­jku­mar, Dean-Ar­mor­er and Charles or­dered them re­leased from prison yes­ter­day and placed un­der house ar­rest.

Ad­dress­ing the fail­ure of prison of­fi­cials to re­lease his clients im­me­di­ate­ly, at­tor­ney Faris Al-Rawi last night said prison of­fi­cers sim­ply re­fused to obey the ini­tial court or­ders.

“Un­for­tu­nate­ly, what hap­pened was they just sim­ply re­fused to re­lease them. Not by an overt state­ment, but the state­ments from the of­fi­cers on the in­side were that they had no au­tho­ri­sa­tion.”

He added: “We made sev­er­al at­tempts to con­tact all rel­e­vant per­sons, at­tor­neys-at-law for the Min­is­ter of Home­land Se­cu­ri­ty, the Com­mis­sion­er of Pris­ons, every­one! Suf­fice it to say that you saw the po­lice come and go, and they were Spe­cial Branch of­fi­cers that came here, they too were turned away. And the State brought an ur­gent ap­pli­ca­tion be­fore the Court of Ap­peal tonight, seek­ing leave to go to the Privy Coun­cil and ask­ing for a stay of the judg­ment.”

Up to 10 pm, Al-Rawi had not been al­lowed in the prison to see his clients.

Hadeed and his wife were on the cusp of free­dom last evening, af­ter the Ap­peal Court had ear­li­er grant­ed per­mis­sion for them to be re­leased im­me­di­ate­ly and placed un­der house ar­rest.

At about 6.30 pm, his bags were packed and Guardian Me­dia, who ar­rived out­side Gold­en Grove around 3.30 pm, saw him en­ter­ing a marked prison ve­hi­cle.

Some­time lat­er, how­ev­er, he was es­cort­ed out of the ve­hi­cle with two plas­tic bags filled with his be­long­ings. There was no sight of his wife through­out this six-hour wait.

Al-Rawi ar­rived some­time af­ter 4 pm, hop­ing to fi­nalise the re­lease of his clients.

How­ev­er, then came word that the State’s lawyers had sought an emer­gency hear­ing be­fore the Ap­peal Court.

And by 9.30 pm, it was clear the cou­ple would be spend­ing an­oth­er night in prison.

Dur­ing the six hours out­side the prison, Guardian Me­dia saw prison of­fi­cers leav­ing and ar­riv­ing, all wish­ing one thing: “Doh tape meh nah.”

While the cam­eras were fo­cused on the en­trance, the of­fi­cers who walked by and in some cas­es drove past at­tempt­ed to keep their gaze away. The ones brave enough to ut­ter words in the di­rec­tion of the me­dia laughed at how quick­ly me­dia per­son­nel had gath­ered. Long be­fore 9.30 pm, some prison of­fi­cials were adamant that the cou­ple would be spend­ing an­oth­er night in prison.

Some prison of­fi­cers al­so rub­bished claims that the cou­ple re­ceived spe­cial treat­ment, in ref­er­ence to the com­plaint made against Pris­ons Com­mis­sion­er Car­los Cor­raspe, which led to his sus­pen­sion ear­li­er this week.

Male and fe­male of­fi­cers alike said the al­le­ga­tions were un­found­ed.

About half an hour af­ter, Hadeed was seen out­side his cell, as three heav­i­ly tint­ed Pra­dos be­long­ing to T&T Po­lice Ser­vice’s Spe­cial Branch ar­rived, in­tend­ing, Al-Rawi said, to take the cou­ple home. How­ev­er, the ve­hi­cles nev­er made it past the dou­ble gates. Af­ter park­ing out­side the prison for a few min­utes, they left with­out their in­tend­ed pas­sen­gers.

In­mates be­ing re­turned to the fa­cil­i­ty al­so shout­ed to the me­dia that they want­ed their free­dom, their voic­es over­shad­ow­ing the sirens of the marked po­lice ve­hi­cles used to es­cort them.

There was al­so ac­tiv­i­ty at the Hadeeds’ Bayshore, West­moor­ings home as prepa­ra­tions in­ten­si­fied for the cou­ple’s re­turn. The res­i­dence was a hive of ac­tiv­i­ty through­out the day, with tech­ni­cians seen in­stalling equip­ment and prepar­ing the prop­er­ty for the ac­ti­va­tion of the elec­tron­ic an­kle mon­i­tor­ing sys­tem that were to be used to en­force the court’s con­di­tions.

A Mo­bile Po­lice Unit was al­so seen en­ter­ing the com­pound dur­ing the af­ter­noon as po­lice strength­ened their op­er­a­tional pres­ence. Of­fi­cers and po­lice ve­hi­cles were ob­served mov­ing in and out of the prop­er­ty at in­ter­vals, while uni­formed per­son­nel main­tained a vis­i­ble pres­ence both in­side the com­pound and along the perime­ter.

Sev­er­al ve­hi­cles parked on the com­pound were re­moved ear­li­er in the day as au­thor­i­ties con­tin­ued prepa­ra­tions ahead of the cou­ple’s ar­rival.

The Hadeeds’ pri­vate se­cu­ri­ty per­son­nel were al­so seen hand­ing over re­spon­si­bil­i­ty for se­cur­ing the prop­er­ty to po­lice, who have since as­sumed con­trol of the res­i­dence in ac­cor­dance with the Court of Ap­peal’s or­der.

Un­der the rul­ing, the Hadeeds were to re­main con­fined to the res­i­dence while wear­ing elec­tron­ic an­kle mon­i­tors.