Local News

WHO expert group fails to find a definitive answer for how COVID-19 began

27 June 2025
This content originally appeared on Trinidad Guardian.
Promote your business with NAN

An ex­pert group charged by the World Health Or­ga­ni­za­tion to in­ves­ti­gate how the COVID-19 pan­dem­ic start­ed re­leased its fi­nal re­port Fri­day, reach­ing an un­sat­is­fy­ing con­clu­sion: Sci­en­tists still aren’t sure how the worst health emer­gency in a cen­tu­ry be­gan.

At a press brief­ing on Fri­day, Ma­ri­etjie Ven­ter, the group’s chair, said that most sci­en­tif­ic da­ta sup­port the hy­poth­e­sis that the new coro­n­avirus jumped to hu­mans from an­i­mals.

That was al­so the con­clu­sion drawn by the first WHO ex­pert group that in­ves­ti­gat­ed the pan­dem­ic’s ori­gins in 2021, when sci­en­tists con­clud­ed the virus like­ly spread from bats to hu­mans, via an­oth­er in­ter­me­di­ary an­i­mal. At the time, WHO said a lab leak was “ex­treme­ly un­like­ly.”

Ven­ter said that af­ter more than three years of work, WHO’s ex­pert group was un­able to get the nec­es­sary da­ta to eval­u­ate whether or not COVID-19 was the re­sult of a lab ac­ci­dent, de­spite re­peat­ed re­quests for hun­dreds of ge­net­ic se­quences and more de­tailed biose­cu­ri­ty in­for­ma­tion that were made to the Chi­nese gov­ern­ment.

“There­fore, this hy­poth­e­sis could not be in­ves­ti­gat­ed or ex­clud­ed,” she said. “It was deemed to be very spec­u­la­tive, based on po­lit­i­cal opin­ions and not backed up by sci­ence.”

She said that the 27-mem­ber group did not reach a con­sen­sus; one mem­ber re­signed ear­li­er this week and three oth­ers asked for their names to be re­moved from the re­port.

Ven­ter said there was no ev­i­dence to prove that COVID-19 had been ma­nip­u­lat­ed in a lab, nor was there any in­di­ca­tion that the virus had been spread­ing be­fore De­cem­ber 2019 any­where out­side of Chi­na.

“Un­til more sci­en­tif­ic da­ta be­comes avail­able, the ori­gins of how SARS-CoV-2 en­tered hu­man pop­u­la­tions will re­main in­con­clu­sive,” Ven­ter said, re­fer­ring to the sci­en­tif­ic name for the COVID-19 virus.

WHO Di­rec­tor-Gen­er­al Tedros Ad­hanom Ghe­breye­sus said it was a “moral im­per­a­tive” to de­ter­mine how COVID be­gan, not­ing that the virus killed at least 20 mil­lion peo­ple, wiped at least $10 tril­lion from the glob­al econ­o­my and up­end­ed the lives of bil­lions.

Last year, the AP found that the Chi­nese gov­ern­ment froze mean­ing­ful do­mes­tic and in­ter­na­tion­al ef­forts to trace the virus’ ori­gins in the first weeks of the out­break in 2020 and that WHO it­self may have missed ear­ly op­por­tu­ni­ties to in­ves­ti­gate how COVID-19 be­gan.

U.S. Pres­i­dent Don­ald Trump has long blamed the emer­gence of the coro­n­avirus on a lab­o­ra­to­ry ac­ci­dent in Chi­na, while a U.S. in­tel­li­gence analy­sis found there was in­suf­fi­cient ev­i­dence to prove the the­o­ry.

Chi­nese of­fi­cials have re­peat­ed­ly dis­missed the idea that the pan­dem­ic could have start­ed in a lab, say­ing that the search for its ori­gins should be con­duct­ed in oth­er coun­tries.

Last Sep­tem­ber, re­searchers ze­roed in on a short list of an­i­mals they think might have spread COVID-19 to hu­mans, in­clud­ing racoon dogs, civet cats and bam­boo rats. —LON­DON (AP)

___________

Sto­ry by MARIA CHENG | As­so­ci­at­ed Press

The As­so­ci­at­ed Press Health and Sci­ence De­part­ment re­ceives sup­port from the Howard Hugh­es Med­ical In­sti­tute’s De­part­ment of Sci­ence Ed­u­ca­tion and the Robert Wood John­son Foun­da­tion. The AP is sole­ly re­spon­si­ble for all con­tent.