Local News

Sizzla rejects claim he demanded Kartel’s fee to perform

08 June 2025
This content originally appeared on Trinidad Guardian.
Promote your business with NAN

Reg­gae artiste Siz­zla has re­ject­ed as false a claim that he de­mand­ed a fee equal to that of fel­low Ja­maican artiste Vy­bz Kar­tel to close the One Caribbean Mu­sic Fes­ti­val af­ter Kar­tel failed to ap­pear.

Kar­tel’s fee was US$1.35 mil­lion to per­form in Trinidad.

Pro­mot­er Dane An­der­son told re­gion­al me­dia that Siz­zla’s team re­vised their fee up­wards af­ter learn­ing that Kar­tel would no longer per­form. Ac­cord­ing to An­der­son, the new de­mand matched Kar­tel’s con­tract­ed amount—an in­crease he said was not fea­si­ble due to the fes­ti­val’s strained bud­get.

“We were pre­pared to pay Siz­zla’s bal­ance as agreed,” An­der­son said. “Un­for­tu­nate­ly, there was a re­quest for sig­nif­i­cant­ly more, and when we could not meet the new de­mand on such short no­tice, they opt­ed to with­draw.”

In an of­fi­cial state­ment, Siz­zla de­scribed that ver­sion of events as a “bla­tant lie.” He said that dur­ing a meet­ing with the pro­mot­er—who had not yet paid the 50 per cent de­posit out­lined in their agree­ment—his team mere­ly sug­gest­ed that the un­paid bal­ance be cov­ered us­ing the funds al­ready al­lo­cat­ed for the miss­ing head­lin­er.

“We sim­ply said to the pro­mot­er in a meet­ing, when he still didn’t of­fer to pay us the 50 per cent of our orig­i­nal con­trac­tu­al amount, that he should pay us the 50 per cent that he was go­ing to pay the artiste that was to head­line the show and didn’t ap­pear, and I will head­line the show,” he wrote.

Siz­zla fur­ther re­vealed that, al­though his con­tract stip­u­lat­ed a 50 per cent ad­vance, he had al­ready ar­rived to per­form at the event af­ter re­ceiv­ing on­ly ten per cent of the agreed fee.

“This is not ac­cept­able—all be­cause of Trinidad—and you still didn’t give us the 50 per cent owed to us, even up­on my ar­rival at the ho­tel,” he said.

De­spite the dis­pute, he ac­knowl­edged the ef­forts of the fes­ti­val’s or­gan­is­ers. “I gen­uine­ly think the pro­mot­er and spon­sors did a very good job; it’s just that the head­lin­er didn’t ap­pear.”

He added that he and his team wait­ed at the ho­tel for hours af­ter the meet­ing, ex­pect­ing a res­o­lu­tion that nev­er came. “The pro­mot­er didn’t get back to us the whole night—we wait­ed and wait­ed, and noth­ing hap­pened. I fell asleep.”

Siz­zla said that even if he had been will­ing to per­form with­out the out­stand­ing pay­ment, the pro­mot­er failed to fol­low up with him.

He closed his state­ment on an up­beat note. “I went to the stu­dio and com­piled my al­bum with some very tal­ent­ed lo­cal acts. We’re mov­ing on. We love Trinidad. One love, Trinidad.”

Mean­while, the fall­out from the col­lapsed fes­ti­val con­tin­ues. Tick­et­ing plat­form Is­land eT­ick­ets is threat­en­ing le­gal ac­tion against pro­mot­er Ja­cho En­ter­tain­ment, de­mand­ing the re­turn of US$80,000 ad­vanced to head­line act Adid­ja “Vy­bz Kar­tel” Palmer.

How­ev­er, Ja­cho En­ter­tain­ment is push­ing back. The com­pa­ny has ac­cused Is­land eT­ick­ets of breach­ing its re­fund pol­i­cy and warned the plat­form to halt all re­pay­ments un­til a full au­dit is com­plet­ed.